OxBlog |
Front page
|
Wednesday, August 04, 2004
# Posted 12:26 AM by Ariel David Adesnik
Needless to say, Clinton had no problem dealing with that one. What struck me, though, was that Clinton's praise for Kerry was somewhat lukewarm. More than once, he said Kerry would make a "good" President. Surely an inspirational speaker like Clinton could do better than that. Clinton also insisted more than once that Kerry should be as specific as possible about what he would do as President, especially in Iraq. I'm wondering if Clinton really meant that. Kerry and Edwards' highly evasive acceptance speeches suggest that they recognize that straddling the fence on Iraq is a political imperative for the candidates of a divided party. And Clinton himself provided almost no specific recommendations of his own, although he did peddle the NATO-will-help-out-if-we-are-nicer-to-them proposal. Yeah right. Also of note, Clinton rejected Dave Letterman's suggestion that yesterday's Orange Alert in NY and Washington was politically motivated. Clinton said straight that the Bush administration was doing its best to deal with a tough issue. Finally, here are a couple of questions that I would've asked Clinton: 1. John Kerry constantly insists that his military experience makes him uniquely qualified to be commander-in-chief. Did your lack of military experience make you less effective as commander-in-chief?Yeah, I know you don't get questions like that on the Late Show. But a blogger can dream, can't he? UPDATE: The fiendishly clever RB writes: I would modify your question #1 slightly by asking Bill Clinton the following:Ouch! (0) opinions -- Add your opinion
Comments:
Post a Comment
|