Tuesday, June 06, 2006
# Posted 11:04 PM by Ariel David Adesnik
Gore: B. I'm no expert on global warming, so I can only describe how Gore sounds to the layman. Very well-spoken. Remarkably well-informed. Stubborn. Naive. And a little bit kooky. He kept insisting that Manhattan might be underwater in the very near future. We just don't know. But give him points for self-awareness: he said that it might not have be a good idea to talk so much about a "planetary emergency" if you have a reputation for being an alarmist.And the hosts:
Stephanopoulos: B. He started out very strong with Gore by beating him at his own game of global warming expertise. Then he seemed to melt into admiration and get a little too excited about Gore in 2008. Here's my idea: A six-month ban on asking any Sunday morning guest about their plans for 2008. It is a complete waste of time better spent on substantive matters.See ya soon. (2) opinions -- Add your opinion
Algore,a D- at best, Divinity School dropout, gets a B for his cloud cuckooland drivel?Post a Comment
Like you, I'm not a GW expert, yet, all info available says that said warming itself may be questionable, but, regardless, the case for humankind's actions causing it is less convincing than the ID propenents for their, to be charitable, "theory"!