OxBlog |
Front page
|
Saturday, June 23, 2007
# Posted 4:28 AM by Taylor Owen
ME TOO!: By any chance, could any of our enlightened oxblog constitutional lawyers explain this one to me:
(4) opinions
--
Add your opinion
The White House said Friday that, like Vice President Dick Cheney's office, President Bush's office is not allowing an independent federal watchdog to oversee its handling of classified national security information.
Comments:
The explanation is at the bottom of the first page of the LA Times article:
"Cheney's office drew criticism Thursday for claiming that it was exempt from the reporting requirements because the vice president's office is not fully within the executive branch. It cited his legislative role as president of the Senate when needed to break a tie." Or, in layman's terms, this paranoid administration will stop at nothing.
I have minimal knowledge of constitutional law, but I have vague memories of reading that the White House staff is not considered to be a part of the executive branch. Rather, it is the personal staff of the President.
Why is that difference significant? I don't really know, but I think this is an established distinction, not something conjured up by the current administration. Perhaps someone with more constitutional knowledge can clarify the situation?
Iād just like to let you know how much I learn from your website Favorited it.Hope 2 be back soon for some more good stuff
Post a Comment
Pandora Bangle
|